What is the precision of rapid diagnostic tests for malaria?


Primary Reviewer: Allen Cheng1, Secondary Reviewer: David Bell 2

1 Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Australia
2 World Health Organization Regional Office for the Western Pacific, Manila, Philippines

Date posted: 8th June 2006

The World Health Organization has produced guidelines for the management of common illnesses in hospitals with limited resources. This series reviews the scientific evidence behind WHO's recommendations. The WHO guidelines, and more reviews are available at
http://www.who.int/child-adolescent-health/publications/CHILD_HEALTH/PB.htm

This review addresses the question: : What is the precision of rapid diagnostic tests for malaria?

The WHO Pocketbook of Hospital Care for Children recommends preparation of blood smears for parasites as the investigation in suspected malaria. No mention of the Rapid diagnostic testing (RDT) is made in the current edition.


Introduction:

Rapid immunochromogenic tests, in simple kit form, can provide results based on fingerprick or venous blood within minutes. They can be used by village health workers after as little as an hour of training [1]. Assays are based on the capture of parasite antigen by monoclonal antibodies incorporated into a test strip. Three types of antigens are targeted; parasite lactate dehydrogenase (pLDH), histidine rich protein 2 (HRP-2, found in P. falciparum only) and aldolase (pan-malarial antigen, found in all malarial species). HRP-2 or P. falciparum-specific pLDH assays are often combined with pan-specific pLDH or aldolase antigen assays in tests that can differentiate falciparum malaria (if the HRP-2 and pan-specific bands are positive) from non-falciparum malaria (if the pan-specific band only is positive). Some tests include pLDH antibodies for P. vivax-specific pLDH. A list of about 20 manufacturers of commercially available rapid tests with evidence of good manufacturing practice is available at the Western Pacific Regional Office website [2].


Methodology

For this review, 145 studies were identified from the following sources: 

• PubMed (NLM/NIH) using the search strategy (rapid malaria) AND (specificity[Title/Abstract]) based on the work of Haynes et al [3] 

• A WHO database of published reviews and trials of malaria rapid diagnostic tests (WPRO http://www.wpro.who.int/sites/rdt/reviews_trials/) 

• Reviews of malarial rapid diagnostic tests [4][5][6][7]


Results

How sensitive and specific are malaria rapid diagnostic tests?
Studies of rapid diagnostic tests have demonstrated widely varying sensitivity, ranging from poor to 100%. Specificity has generally been good in most studies. It is difficult to compare studies due to different test manufacturers, possible batch-to-batch variation [8], possible geographic variation in malarial antigens [7], varying environmental conditions [9], varying proportions of pre-treated patients, differing gold standards (PCR or microscopy), differing parasite densities, malarial species in disparate populations, and inadequacies in study design and reporting.

In general, field studies in endemic countries have reported lower sensitivity, possibly related to assay degradation in hot and humid conditions or batch variability [8], and differing parasite densities in endemic populations compared to non-immune, traveller populations. Unpublished evidence suggests that HRP-2-based assays are more stable than pLDH or aldolase-based assays [7], although newer pLDH-based tests may have improved stability [9]. Sensitivity was also lower in low-level parasitaemia (<500-1000/µL)[10][11][12][13], pregnancy (with lower parasitaemia related to placental sequestration)[14], non-falciparum malaria [8][15], pre-treated patients (particularly with the pLDH assay which closely correlates with parasitaemia) [16][17] and the use of PCR (compared with microscopy) as the gold standard[18] .

What are the differences between the tests?
Generally, HRP2-based assays appear to be more sensitive than falciparum-specific pLDH RDT [8][12][13][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. This is supported by a systematic review of rapid tests in returned travelers [5]. Published data also indicates that the pLDH-based OptiMAL assay appears to be more sensitive than the aldolase antibodies used in the aldolase-based assays [8][13][26]. However, persistence of HRP-2 antigen is prolonged compared to pLDH and thus cannot be used to predict post-treatment parasitaemia[27][28][29][30] . pLDH and aldolase closely correlates with parasitaemia; some studies suggest that they may be used for monitoring response to treatment if microscopy is not available [17][31][32].

Although studies laboratory settings have demonstrated good sensitivity and specificity, several studies have reported poor sensitivity in field evaluations. Some reports assessed pLDH assays having sensitivities as low as 32-43%[8][14] . Other studies have demonstrated poor sensitivity of HRP-2 assays (as low as 5% for P. falciparum only) [33] and aldolase assays as low as 3-23% [8][28]. Given this heterogeneity, it is suggested that candidate test kits be evaluated under local field conditions prior to widespread adoption.

What are the characteristics of rapid diagnostic tests in children?
Few studies were conducted in children specifically[24][34][35][36][37] . At least one study has demonstrated increased sensitivity of a HRP2 assay in children compared to adults, attributed to lower immunity and possibly less interference by antibodies [38]. Despite this, there is concern that the benefits of parasitological confirmation in children under 5 years may be outweighed by the risks of not treating children with false negative tests [7]. No published studies were identified that specifically address this issue.

Are malaria rapid diagnostic tests cost-effective?
Few studies evaluated cost effectiveness and results are unlikely to be generalizable due to variations in context. Rapid tests may be cost effective in settings where microscopy is unavailable and treatment would be provided to all febrile patients[37] but field microscopy may be more cost effective in some situations [39][40], particularly where case-load is high. In areas where the prevalence of malaria is high, clinical diagnosis based on fever and/or anaemia may be even more cost effective than microscopy or rapid diagnostic testing [24][41]. A decision on whether to adopt rapid diagnostic testing should take into account the current alternatives in a region (such as quality microscopy services), the availability of skilled personnel and resources, the baseline prevalence of malaria (including intercurrent epidemics), the predominant malarial species and the cost of acquisition and deployment (including storage and transportation) and the capacity for training and supervision


Summary

  • RDT storage and distribution should include a quality assurance system including monitoring of sensitivity, a cool chain where possible, appropriate instructions and training, and supervision (level 5).

  • The cost-effectiveness of rapid tests should be evaluated locally prior to widespread adoption. (level 5)

  • Test performance, under field conditions, should be evaluated prior to adoption, and if possible, each batch should be evaluated in a reference laboratory (level 5). Assays may be susceptible to heat and humidity.

  • If cost-effective, HRP-2-based assays are recommended if P. falciparum is the predominant species (either alone or as a mixed infection) (such as sub-Saharan Africa and lowland Papua New Guinea) (level 5)

  • If cost-effective and adequately stable, combination HRP-2 or pLDH based assays should be used in regions where multiple malarial species are present. (level 5)

  • HRP-2 tests should not be used for detection of parasitaemia following treatment (level 3b). Limited data suggests that aldolase and pLDH assays may be used to monitor the response to treatment (level 3b).


    References


    1. Mayxay M, Newton PN, Yeung S, Pongvongsa T, Phompida S, Phetsouvanh R, et al. Short communication: An assessment of the use of malaria rapid tests by village health volunteers in rural Laos. Trop Med Int Health 2004;9(3):325-9.[Medline]

    2. WHO. List of known commercially available antigen detecting malaria RDTs with adequate evidence of good manufacturing practice [website: http://www.wpro.who.int/NR/rdonlyres/E3597CBA-2ED4-4FCC-AB1C-CE25FC6AA30E/0/M_D_Webbuy_Table8.pdf]. In: WHO Western Pacific Regional Office; 2005.[Medline]

    3. Haynes RB, Wilczynski NL. Optimal search strategies for retrieving scientifically strong studies of diagnosis from Medline: analytical survey. Bmj 2004;328(7447):1040.[Medline]

    4. Moody A. Rapid diagnostic tests for malaria parasites. Clin Microbiol Rev 2002;15(1):66-78.[Medline]

    5. Marx A, Pewsner D, Egger M, Nuesch R, Bucher HC, Genton B, et al. Meta-analysis: accuracy of rapid tests for malaria in travelers returning from endemic areas. Ann Intern Med 2005;142(10):836-46.[Medline]

    6. Cruciani M, Nardi S, Malena M, Bosco O, Serpelloni G, Mengoli C. Systematic review of the accuracy of the ParaSight-F test in the diagnosis of Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Med Sci Monit 2004;10(7):MT81-8.[Medline]

    7. WHO. Interim notes on selection of type of malaria rapid diagnostic test in relation to the occurrence of different parasite species [website: http://www.wpro.who.int/NR/rdonlyres/CF152D7C-25BA-49E7-86D2-DBEE4E5B5974/0/INTERIMNOTESONMALARIARDTS_RBM_final2_rev3.pdf]: Regional Offices for Africa and Western Pacific; 2005.[Medline]

    8. Mason DP, Kawamoto F, Lin K, Laoboonchai A, Wongsrichanalai C. A comparison of two rapid field immunochromatographic tests to expert microscopy in the diagnosis of malaria. Acta Trop 2002;82(1):51-9.[Medline]

    9. Moody AH, Chiodini PL. Non-microscopic method for malaria diagnosis using OptiMAL IT, a second-generation dipstick for malaria pLDH antigen detection. Br J Biomed Sci 2002;59(4):228-31.[Medline]

    10. Farcas GA, Zhong KJ, Lovegrove FE, Graham CM, Kain KC. Evaluation of the Binax NOW ICT test versus polymerase chain reaction and microscopy for the detection of malaria in returned travelers. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2003;69(6):589-92.[Medline]

    11. Soto Tarazona A, Solari Zerpa L, Mendoza Requena D, Llanos-Cuentas A, Magill A. Evaluation of the rapid diagnostic test OptiMAL for diagnosis of malaria due to Plasmodium vivax. Braz J Infect Dis 2004;8(2):151-5.[Medline]

    12. Iqbal J, Khalid N, Hira PR. Comparison of two commercial assays with expert microscopy for confirmation of symptomatically diagnosed malaria. J Clin Microbiol 2002;40(12):4675-8.[Medline]

    13. Huong NM, Davis TM, Hewitt S, Huong NV, Uyen TT, Nhan DH, et al. Comparison of three antigen detection methods for diagnosis and therapeutic monitoring of malaria: a field study from southern Vietnam. Trop Med Int Health 2002;7(4):304-8.[Medline]

    14. VanderJagt TA, Ikeh EI, Ujah IO, Belmonte J, Glew RH, VanderJagt DJ. Comparison of the OptiMAL rapid test and microscopy for detection of malaria in pregnant women in Nigeria. Trop Med Int Health 2005;10(1):39-41.[Medline]

    15. Richardson DC, Ciach M, Zhong KJ, Crandall I, Kain KC. Evaluation of the Makromed dipstick assay versus PCR for diagnosis of Plasmodium falciparum malaria in returned travelers. J Clin Microbiol 2002;40(12):4528-30.[Medline]

    16. Palmer CJ, Bonilla JA, Bruckner DA, Barnett ED, Miller NS, Haseeb MA, et al. Multicenter study to evaluate the OptiMAL test for rapid diagnosis of malaria in U.S. hospitals. J Clin Microbiol 2003;41(11):5178-82.[Medline]

    17. Moody A, Hunt-Cooke A, Gabbett E, Chiodini P. Performance of the OptiMAL malaria antigen capture dipstick for malaria diagnosis and treatment monitoring at the Hospital for Tropical Diseases, London. Br J Haematol 2000;109(4):891-4.[Medline]

    18. Rubio JM, Buhigas I, Subirats M, Baquero M, Puente S, Benito A. Limited level of accuracy provided by available rapid diagnosis tests for malaria enhances the need for PCR-based reference laboratories. J Clin Microbiol 2001;39(7):2736-7.[Medline]

    19. Jelinek T, Grobusch MP, Schwenke S, Steidl S, von Sonnenburg F, Nothdurft HD, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of dipstick tests for rapid diagnosis of malaria in nonimmune travelers. J Clin Microbiol 1999;37(3):721-3.[Medline]

    20. Lee MA, Aw LT, Singh M. A comparison of antigen dipstick assays with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique and blood film examination in the rapid diagnosis of malaria. Ann Acad Med Singapore 1999;28(4):498-501.[Medline]

    21. Ricci L, Viani I, Piccolo G, Fabio A, Calderaro A, Galati L, et al. Evaluation of OptiMAL Assay test to detect imported malaria in Italy. New Microbiol 2000;23(4):391-8.[Medline]

    22. Iqbal J, Hira PR, Sher A, Al-Enezi AA. Diagnosis of imported malaria by Plasmodium lactate dehydrogenase (pLDH) and histidine-rich protein 2 (PfHRP-2)-based immunocapture assays. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2001;64(1-2):20-3.[Medline]

    23. Labbe AC, Pillai DR, Hongvangthong B, Vanisaveth V, Pomphida S, Inkathone S, et al. The performance and utility of rapid diagnostic assays for Plasmodium falciparum malaria in a field setting in the Lao People's Democratic Republic. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 2001;95(7):671-7.[Medline]

    24. Tarimo DS, Minjas JN, Bygbjerg IC. Malaria diagnosis and treatment under the strategy of the integrated management of childhood illness (IMCI): relevance of laboratory support from the rapid immunochromatographic tests of ICT Malaria P.f/P.v and OptiMal. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 2001;95(5):437-44.[Medline]

    25. Craig MH, Bredenkamp BL, Williams CH, Rossouw EJ, Kelly VJ, Kleinschmidt I, et al. Field and laboratory comparative evaluation of ten rapid malaria diagnostic tests. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2002;96(3):258-65.[Medline]

    26. Cho D, Kim KH, Park SC, Kim YK, Lee KN, Lim CS. Evaluation of rapid immunocapture assays for diagnosis of Plasmodium vivax in Korea. Parasitol Res 2001;87(6):445-8.[Medline]

    27. Richter J, Gobels K, Muller-Stover I, Hoppenheit B, Haussinger D. Co-reactivity of plasmodial histidine-rich protein 2 and aldolase on a combined immuno-chromographic-malaria dipstick (ICT) as a potential semi-quantitative marker of high Plasmodium falciparum parasitaemia. Parasitol Res 2004;94(5):384-5.[Medline]

    28. Grobusch MP, Hanscheid T, Gobels K, Slevogt H, Zoller T, Rogler G, et al. Comparison of three antigen detection tests for diagnosis and follow-up of falciparum malaria in travellers returning to Berlin, Germany. Parasitol Res 2003;89(5):354-7.[Medline]

    29. Singh N, Shukla MM. Short report: Field evaluation of posttreatment sensitivity for monitoring parasite clearance of Plasmodium falciparum malaria by use of the Determine Malaria pf test in central India. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2002;66(3):314-6.[Medline]

    30. Oduola AM, Omitowoju GO, Sowunmi A, Makler MT, Falade CO, Kyle DE, et al. Plasmodium falciparum: evaluation of lactate dehydrogenase in monitoring therapeutic responses to standard antimalarial drugs in Nigeria. Exp Parasitol 1997;87(3):283-9.[Medline]

    31. Eisen DP, Saul A. Disappearance of pan-malarial antigen reactivity using the ICT Malaria P.f/P.v kit parallels decline of patent parasitaemia as shown by microscopy. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2000;94(2):169-70.[Medline]

    32. Belizario VY, Pasay CJ, Bersabe MJ, de Leon WU, Guerrero DM, Bugaoisan VM. Field evaluation of malaria rapid diagnostic tests for the diagnosis of P. falciparum and non-P. falciparum infections. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 2005;36(3):552-61.[Medline]

    33. Singh N, Saxena A, Sharma VP. Usefulness of an inexpensive, Paracheck test in detecting asymptomatic infectious reservoir of plasmodium falciparum during dry season in an inaccessible terrain in central India. J Infect 2002;45(3):165-8.[Medline]

    34. Bojang KA. The diagnosis of Plasmodium falciparum infection in Gambian children, by field staff using the rapid, manual, ParaSight-F test. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 1999;93(7):685-7.[Medline]

    35. Bechem NN, Leke RF, Tietche F, Taylor DW. Evaluation of a rapid test for histidine rich protein 2 for diagnosis of Plasmodium falciparum infection in Cameroonian children. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1999;93(1):46.[Medline]

    36. Rimon MM, Kheng S, Hoyer S, Thach V, Ly S, Permin AE, et al. Malaria dipsticks beneficial for IMCI in Cambodia. Trop Med Int Health 2003;8(6):536-43.[Medline]

    37. Fryauff DJ, Gomez-Saladin E, Purnomo, Sumawinata I, Sutamihardja MA, Tuti S, et al. Comparative performance of the ParaSight F test for detection of Plasmodium falciparum in malaria-immune and nonimmune populations in Irian Jaya, Indonesia. Bull World Health Organ 1997;75(6):547-52.[Medline]

    38. Kolaczinski J, Mohammed N, Ali I, Ali M, Khan N, Ezard N, et al. Comparison of the OptiMAL rapid antigen test with field microscopy for the detection of Plasmodium vivax and P. falciparum: considerations for the application of the rapid test in Afghanistan. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 2004;98(1):15-20.[Medline]

    39. Fernando SD, Karunaweera ND, Fernando WP, Attanayake N, Wickremasinghe AR. A cost analysis of the use of the rapid, whole-blood, immunochromatographic P.f/P.v assay for the diagnosis of Plasmodium vivax malaria in a rural area of Sri Lanka. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 2004;98(1):5-13.[Medline]

    40. Rolland E, Checchi F, Pinoges L, Balkan S, Guthmann JP, Guerin PJ. Operational response to malaria epidemics: are rapid diagnostic tests cost-effective? Trop Med Int Health 2006;11(4):398-408.[Medline]

    •