What is the evidence for kangaroo
mother care of the very low birth weight baby?
Primary Reviewer: Kylie
Blackwell 1
Secondary Reviewer: Adriano Cattaneo
2
1 Royal
Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
2 Istituto
Burlo Garofolo, Trieste,Iitaly
Date posted: 13th
May 2007
The World Health
Organization has produced guidelines for the
management of common illnesses in hospitals with limited resources.
This series reviews the scientific evidence behind WHO's
recommendations. The WHO guidelines, and more reviews are available at
http://www.who.int/child-adolescent-health/publications/CHILD_HEALTH/PB.htm
This
review addresses the question: what is the evidence for
kangaroo mother care of the very low birth weight baby?
The
WHO Pocketbook of
Hospital Care for Children
recommends skin contact for LBW
and VLBW babies (Pocketbook chapter 3.10.2, page 53 ff).
Introduction:
World wide more
than 20 million babies are born each year with low
birthweight. This represents 15.5% of all births.
Of these low birth weight babies, 95.6% are born in developing
countries [11]. The
World Health Organization defines low birth weight
as weight at birth less than 2500 grams, and very low birth weight as
weight at birth less than 1500 grams [11].
Of these babies,
approximately one third die before stabilization or in the first twelve
hours. Low birth weight and very low birth weight babies require
intensive neonatal nursing and care from often limited resources at a
vast expense.
Kangaroo mother
care was initially conceived in Bogotá,
Colombia in 1978 as an alternative to traditional methods of care for
the low birth weight baby. The initiative behind this method
of care was to address the problem of overcrowding and insufficient and
expensive resources in neonatal intensive care units, together with the
associated high morbidity and mortality amongst this group of neonates.
Kangaroo mother care consists of skin-to skin contact between mother
and infant, both in hospital and at home, until the infant is 41 weeks
corrected age. The key features of kangaroo mother care are early,
continuous and prolonged skin-to-skin contact between the mother and
baby, accomplished by the baby being firmly attached to the mother
chest both day and night, allowing frequent and exclusive breastfeeding
(formula feeds or intravenous fluids are used if required). Kangaroo
mother care is initiated in hospital and can be continued at home,
allowing small babies, regardless of weight or gestational age, to be
discharged early, provided there is adequate support and follow-up
arranged [13]. Kangaroo care is
then continued at home until the infant
is no longer able to cope with it – demonstrated by crying,
pushing out limbs or appear uncomfortable - usually at 40-41 weeks
corrected age. Different countries and studies have adopted variations
to the kangaroo method of care, including shorter durations, gavage or
suck feeding, in hospital or at home care. All studies have looked at
babies randomised to kangaroo mother care compared to conventional
method of care (incubator and standard neonatal intensive care nursing).
Kangaroo mother
care is seldom used in very low birthweight or low
birthweight babies in developed nations. This review intends
to determine if there is evidence to support the use of kangaroo mother
care for very low birth weight babies, providing an alternative to
conventional methods of care.
Methodology
The clinical search
strategy employed was as follows: (kangaroo mother care OR kangaroo
care) AND (very low birth weight OR low birth weight). Using the
clinical filters for both “therapy” and
“specific”, 66 articles were found; using the same
filter but restricting the filter to systematic reviews only, a further
39 articles were found.
All articles
included both very low birth weight and low birth weight
babies. All abstracts were read, if there was any doubt as to the
relevance of the article, the complete article was sourced.
We excluded articles that did not directly evaluate the benefits and
problems of kangaroo mother care, and those articles that looked at
kangaroo mother care of the term infant. In many of the randomized
controlled trials (RCT’s) kangaroo mother care was undertaken
for short periods of 2-4 hours, and most of these babies were subject
to both kangaroo mother care and conventional methods of care at
different times in the study. These articles were excluded, except
where kangaroo mother care was initiated from birth and the trial
examined the effect of kangaroo mother care during the initial period
of stabilization.
7 RCT’s
were included once the above exclusion criteria were
observed; 1 trial was excluded because the intervention of kangaroo
mother care was a combination of kangaroo care and incubator care.
2 Cochrane reviews were sourced. The first looked at only healthy
newborns, all of which were born at term and was hence excluded. The
second review included only 3 of the above listed RCT’s and
was included.
Broadening the
clinical search strategy to “kangaroo mother
care”, and using the clinical filters for both
“therapy” and “specific”, 307
articles were found. All abstracts for these articles were read.
Articles that did not look at evidence for or against the use of
kangaroo mother care as a primary outcome were excluded. If babies were
subject to both periods of kangaroo mother care alternating with
periods of conventional care, these articles were excluded. 4 further
RCT’s were included.All articles included were type 1b.
Results
In all studies, the
birthweight of babies ranged from 1000grams to
2000grams. In all but one study [1]
approximately 20-30% of very low
birth weight and low birth weight infants died before and during the
stabilization period – in these studies babies were eligible
to the trial only once stabilized (not requiring ventilatory
support, not suffering from frequent apnoeas, stable temperature, not
requiring intravenous nutrition). Babies once stabilized and
eligible to enrol in the trial ranged from 3-11 days old. In all
studies, including the study done in Ethiopia looking at early
enrolment, a further 10-50% were excluded for reasons of multiple
births, mother not available for care, malformations, consent not
gained, early detection of major perinatal conditions participation
refusal. Overall, usually only 30-60% of potential babies were enrolled
in the studies.
A Cochrane review was done in 2003 to determine whether there was
evidence to support the use of kangaroo mother care in low birth weight
infants as an alternative to conventional care after the initial period
of stabilization with conventional care [2].
This review looked at
randomized trials and included only 3 studies [4,
5, 6]. The review
concluded that although kangaroo mother care appears to reduce severe
infant morbidity without any serious deleterious effect, there was
insufficient evidence to recommend its routine use in low birth weight
infants and well designed randomized controlled trials were needed. [2]
The primary outcome in five studies looked at the mortality rate from
the initiation of kangaroo mother care, starting after the baby was
stabilized, up to 12 months of age. The studies showed no increase in
mortality when babies were nursed via the kangaroo method as opposed to
the conventional method of care [3,
4, 6]. One study demonstrated a
non-significant difference in increased survival in these babies; there
was a reduction, though not statistically significant, in infant
mortality from 2.9% to 1.6% (RR + 0.59, 95% CI 0.22-1.6) [6]. In all
studies the majority of deaths occurred in the first 12 hours. One
study of 123 very low birth weight babies from Ethiopia looked at the
effect on survival if kangaroo mother care was commenced from delivery,
prior to stabilization of the low birth weight infant. Conventional
care in this study had been care in a small heated room, rather than
care in an incubator. The mean age at enrolment was 10 hours of age.
This study revealed a significant decline in death rate from 38%
(24/63) in the conventional care group to 22.5% (14/62), p<0.05 [1]
Morbidity associated with kangaroo mother care was looked at by four
studies. Focussing on infection, less infants in the kangaroo care
programme suffered from nosocomial infections during the period of
eligibility to 41 weeks corrected age, the difference being
approximately 3.4-3.8% compared to 6.8-7.8% (p = 0.02, RR 2.01, 95% CI
1.04-3.87) [3, 6]. In
all but one study, there was no significant
difference in the number or severity of overall infections during this
period, up until 12 months corrected age [3,
5, 6], with only one study
showing a significant reduction in severe respiratory infections at six
months [4]. However,
there was a significant difference seen in one
study from Columbia between those infections that could be managed as
an outpatient, 6.7% in the kangaroo care group compared to 2.8% in the
conventional care group (p = 0.019). [6]
Kangaroo mother care, in three trials, was shown to have a positive
effect on exclusive breast-feeding at 41 weeks corrected age and at 6
weeks post-term [3,5,6].
One study carried out in the
different settings of Ethiopia, Indonesia and Mexico found a
significant increase in exclusive breast feeding at discharge if nursed
by the kangaroo care method, 88% vs. 70% (p = 0.00001) [5].
In addition, these babies had better mean daily weight gains in all
studies, after the first week of life, ranging from 15.9 to 21.3 g/day
vs. 10.2 to17.7g/day (p < 0.05)
[3, 4, 5, 6]. Along with
increased rates of breast feeding and better weight gains, the average
length of stay in hospital, from eligibility to 41 weeks corrected age,
was reduced [1, 2, 4, 6, 8]
Babies in the kangaroo care group were
discharged earlier (13.4 days vs. 16.3 days after enrolment) [5]. The
maximum reduction on hospital stay was seen for those infants with a
birth weight less than 1500g [3, 6].
Infants managed by kangaroo care exhibit more temperature stability as
found in three studies [5, 7, 8].
Hypothermia was significantly more
common in conventional methods of care infants (RR 0.74, 95% CI
0.62-0.88, p = 0.0005) [5].
A significant reduction in episodes of
hypothermia was seen in babies nursed by the kangaroo mother care
method (10/44 vs. 21/45, p<0.01). [8]
Two trials showed that Kangaroo mother care results in no difference in
psychomotor development using the Griggith Quotient at 12 months
corrected age [3, 6].
There was no significant difference seen for
growth indices of infants enrolled in the kangaroo method of care [4,
6]. In one study, head circumference in kangaroo mother care
babies was
significantly increased by 0.5cm greater (p = 0.05) compared to
conventional method of care babies from 3 to 12 months corrected age.
[3]
One study looked at the benefit of early kangaroo care with respect to
physiological stabilization, from birth, in very low birth weight
infants [8].
These babies reached stability (cardiovascular,
respiratory and oxygenation) sooner than those being cared for in
incubators. All babies were stable after 6 hours of kangaroo care
compared to only half on the incubator babies [7]
Babies spend more
time in quiet sleep and less time crying [12].
No adverse events were
recorded in this study. Kangaroo care has also been shown not to
compromise the maturation of the pituitary-thyroid axis and adrenal
function in healthy preterm infants [9].
In five studies staff and mothers were surveyed, reporting a high level
of satisfaction and comfort [1, 3,
5, 6, 8], whilst more than 95% of
those surveyed found kangaroo mother care both acceptable and feasible [1, 8]. Mothers providing
kangaroo care also gained confidence in the
care of their low birth weight babies [3].
The kangaroo care method, in
all countries where the studies were done, was deemed socially
acceptable [8]. Kangaroo
mother care resulted in observed changes in
the mothers’ perception of her child, attributed to the
closeness of the skin-to-skin contact – the
“bonding effect” by the empowering nature of
kangaroo mother care. [8]
Discussion
Kangaroo mother
care has been used successfully in developing countries throughout the
world for the last 25 years as a “humanizing”
alternative to conventional methods of neonatal care with the aim to
improve the health and potentially survival of low and very low birth
weight babies. The neonatal mortality rate of very low birth weight and
low birth weight babies is high, with more than 30% of babies dying
before stabilization and hence eligibility for kangaroo mother care.
However, evidence to date seems to suggest that that the outcome of
these babies improves if kangaroo mother care is commenced early,
before stabilization, and indeed, allows for earlier stabilization.
More large randomised controlled trials are required to show the true
benefit on neonatal mortality.
The current
evidence suggests that kangaroo mother care may be
associated with a reduction in nosocomial infections and severe
illness, increased early weight gains with no reduction in growth
indices, reduced length of stay in hospital, and high levels of
maternal satisfaction.
To date, the
randomized trials have mainly focussed on the healthy,
medically stable, singleton of very low and low birth weight, born in
hospital, and have hence excluded up to 70% of babies born with a birth
weight less than 2000grams. Only one trial included infants prior to
stabilization, though still excluding 50% of potential low birth weight
babies due to reasons of malformation, multiple birth or mother being
unavailable. No studies have been conducted looking at kangaroo mother
care for very low birth weight infants in an ambulatory setting. No
trial has evaluated the effect of kangaroo mother care with respect to
costs involved in the managements of these babies. Due to lack of
available evidence, kangaroo mother care must be used with caution in
the unwell and unstable baby, babies delivered at home, multiple birth
babies or those with congenital malformation. Further trials are needed
focussing on all very low and low birth weight babies looking at the
effect of kangaroo mother care initiated from birth, as well as
kangaroo mother care initiated at home.
Summary
Very low birth
weight and low birth weight babies have a high risk of
mortality and morbidity. The care of such babies requires the use of
expensive and often scarce resources and adequately trained staff.
Evidence suggests that kangaroo mother care is a safe and effective
alternative to conventional methods of neonatal care for very low birth
weight babies. It reduces the mortality rate if introduced early and
reduces the risk of nosocomial and severe infections. Kangaroo mother
care has a positive effect on breast-feeding at term and during the
neonatal period. It does not lead to impairment in growth or
psychomotor development. It leads to high levels of
satisfaction by staff and mothers, promoting bonding and installing
confidence in the mothers of very low birth weight babies. Care must be
taken with the use of kangaroo mother care in babies who are not
medically stable and inn multiple birth babies as no evidence exists
regarding the benefit of kangaroo mother care in these settings.
References
1. Worku, B., Kassie, A., Kangaroo Mother
Care: A
randomized controlled trial on effectiveness of early kangaroo mother
care for the low birthweight infants in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. J Trop
Ped, 2005. 51(2): p.93-97. [Medline]
2. Conde-Agudelo, A., Diaz-Rossello,
J.L., Belizan,
J.M., Kangaroo mother care to reduce morbidity and mortality in low
birthweight infants (Cochrane Review 2003). In: The Cochrane Library
2005, Issue 3. Accessed
at:
http://www.the cochranelibrary.com [Medline]
3. Charpak, N., Ruiz-Pelaez, J.G., et
al., A
randomized, controlled trial of kangaroo mother care: results of
follow-up at 1 year of corrected age. Pediatrics, 2001. 108(5):
p.1072-1079.[Medline]
4. Sloan, N.L., Camacho, L.W., Rochas,
E.P., et al.,
Kangaroo mother method: randomised controlled trial of an alternative
method of care for stabilised low-birthweight infants. Maternidad
Isidro Ayora Study Team. Lancet, 1994. 344(8925): p. 782-785 [Medline]
5. Cattaneo, A., Davanzo, R., Worku, B.,
et al.,
Kangaroo mother care for low birth weight infants; a randomised
controlled trial in different settings. Acta Paed., 1998. 87:
p.976-985 [Medline]
6. Charpak, N., Ruiz-Palaez, J.G., et
al., Kangaroo
mother versus traditional care for newborn infants < 2000 grams:
a
randomised controlled trial. Pediatrics, 1997. 100(4): p.682-688
[Medline]
7. Bergman, N.J., Linley, L.L., Fawcus,
S.R.,
Randomized controlled trial of skin-to-skin contact from birth versus
conventional incubator for physiological stabilization in 1200- to
2199-gram newborns. Acta Paed, 2004. 93; p.779-785 [Medline]
8. Kadam, S., Binoy, S., Kanbur, W., at
al.,
Feasibility of kangaroo mother care in Mumbai. Indian J. Ped, 2005. 72;
p35-38. [Medline]
9. Weller, A., Rozin, A., Charpak, N., et
al.,
Longitudinal assessment of pituitary-thyroid axis and adrenal function
in preterm infants raised by kangaroo mother care. Hormone Research,
2002. 5791-20: p.22-26 [Medline]
10. Tessier, R., Cristo, M., Velez, S.,
et al.,
Kangaroo mother care and the bonding hypothesis. Pediatrics, 1998.
102(2): e17 [Medline]
11. United Nations Children’s
Fund and World
Health Organization, Low birth weight: country, regional and global
estimates. UNICEF, New York, 2005.[Medline]
12. Ferber, S.G., Makhoul, I.R., The
effect of
skin-to-skin contact (Kangaroo Care) shortly after birth on the
neurobehavioural responses of the term newborn: a randomized,
controlled trial. Pediatrics, 2004. 113(4): p.858-864 [Medline]
13. World Health Organization, Kangaroo
mother care: a practical guide. WHO, Geneva, 2003 [Medline]
|
|