What is the value of bicarbonate in correcting acidosis during newborn resuscitation?
Primary Reviewers: Opiyo Newton, Mike English
1
Secondary Reviewer:W James Tibballs 2
1 KEMRI / Wellcome Trust, Nairobi, Kenya
2 Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne
Date posted: 19th April 2006
The World Health Organization has produced guidelines for the
management of common illnesses in hospitals with limited resources.
This series reviews the scientific evidence behind WHO's
recommendations. The WHO guidelines, and more reviews are available at
http://www.who.int/child-adolescent-health/publications/CHILD_HEALTH/PB.htm
This review addresses the question: What is the value of bicarbonate in correcting acidosis during newborn resuscitation?
The WHO Pocketbook of Hospital Care for Children currently makes no
recommendation regarding the use of bicarbonate in neonatal
resuscitation.
Introduction
Drugs have traditionally been used in newborns who do not respond to
adequate ventilation and chest compressions. However, in newborn
resuscitation, the emphasis is on adequate ventilation and compressions
as drugs will be useless unless the primary problems of
hypoxaemia/ischaemia are overcome and there is some degree of
circulation. There is still no firm evidence for or against sodium
bicarbonate in neonatal resuscitation.
Methods
Articles were identified through Medline searches by use of Pubmed clinical queries.
Using the terms acidosis AND (sodium
bicarbonate OR bicarbonate) AND (newborn OR infant OR neonat*) and
searching under the clinical filter for systematic reviews, 6 articles
were found, 2 of which were relevant. Using the terms (bicarbonate OR
acidosis) AND newborn resuscitation under therapy, broad, sensitive
(Limits: Publication Date from 1980 to 2005), 85 articles were
retrieved, 2 of which were relevant.
The title and abstract of each
retrieved study was read by two independent reviewers to assess
eligibility; those on the use of bicarbonate in correcting newborn
acidosis were selected. The methodological quality of the selected
articles were assessed using the Oxford Centre for Evidence Based
Medicine Levels of Evidence (CEBM LOE) [1].
Overall, 2 systematic reviews (SRs), 2
randomised control trials (RCTs) and 1 Guideline were identified; 2
were level 1a evidence while two had a LOE of 1b (Table1).
Results
Mortalityas an outcome was reported by one SR [2] and one study [3];
the SR did not find evidence of an effect on mortality (RR 1.39, 95% CI
0.72 to 2.67), RD 0.12, 95% CI -0.12 to 0.36), although only one small
RCT measured this effect. Similarly, the composite primary outcome of
death or abnormal neurological examination at discharge was similar in
both groups (52% vs 54%, p=0.88)[3].
The incidence of intra/peri-ventricular haemorrhage was reported by 2 studies [2][3] one SR [2]
did not find evidence of an effect in this outcome (RR 1.24 95% CI 0.47
to 3.28; RD 0.05, 95% CI -0.16 to 0.25). The same SR noted that sodium
bicarbonate may cause hypernatraemia and has been associated with
intra-ventricular haemorrhage when given rapidly and in large
quantities. In one study [3]the
incidence of intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH) was similar between
groups, 11% vs 10.7%. All the intraventricular bleeds were seen in the
preterm neonates.
Arterial blood pH/ excess was reported by one SR [2]and two studies [3][4].
The SR did not find any statitistically significant difference in the
rate at which pH was corrected or in the mean arterial blood pH levels
after commencing the intervention. The same SR reported failure to
improve pH >7.25 and base excess to <-6mmol/litre within 4 hours
of treatment. However, this difference was of borderline statistical
significant: RR 0.28, 95% CI 0.07-1.11). In the two studies[3][4] the mean pH was between the groups.
There were no significant differences in the other outcomes; encephalopathy, cerebral edema, need for ventilation, duration of respiratory distress, seizures [4] and need for inotropic support, multiple-organ dysfunction [3].
One SR [5]
found no studies meeting the criteria for inclusion and concluded that
there is no evidence available from RCTs to support or refute the rapid
correction of metabolic acidaemia in low birth weight infants as
compared with slow or no correction.
Discussion
The findings of this review demonstrate that
bicarbonate administration in preterm infants with metabolic acidosis
is of no value; mortality was similar between the groups. Similarly,
there were no significant differences in abnormal neurological
examination, arterial blood pH/base excess, encephalopathy, cerebral
edema and need for ventilation.
The use of bicarbonate has potential
risks; rapid administration of large quantities of sodium bicarbonate
may cause hypernatremia and intra-ventricular haemorrhage. Furthermore,
the hyperosmolarity and CO2 generating properties of sodium bicarbonate
may be detrimental to myocardial or cerebral function.
The small number of studies found may, however, limit the strengths of the above findings.
Summary
Based on the available evidence (from the
current review), bicarbonate administration does not help to improve
survival or immediate neurological outcome. Bicarbonate infusion has
potential risks. Thus, consideration should be given to revision of
current recommendations. The above notwithstanding, there is need for
larger studies to confirm the above findings.
Table1: Characteristics of included studies
Please click here to view table in new window
References
- http://www.cebm.net/levels_of_evidence.asp#levels. [URL]
- Lawn CJ, Weir FJ, McGuire, W. Base
Administration or Fluid Bolus for preventing Morbidity and Mortality in
Preterm infants with Metabolic Acidosis (Review). The Cochrane Database
of Systematic Reviews 2005. [Medline]
- Lokesh L, Kumar P, Murki S et al. A Randomized
Controlled Trial of Sodium Bicarbonate in Neonatal Resuscitation-Effect
on Immediate Outcome. Resuscitation 2004; 60: 219-223. [Medline]
- Murki S, Kumar P, Lingappa L, et al. Effect of a
Single Dose of Sodium Bicarbonate Given during Neonatal Resuscitation
at Birth on the Acid -Base Status on First Day of Life. Journal of
Perinatology 2004; 24:696-699. [Medline]
- Kecskes Z, Davis MW. Rapid Correction of Early
Metabolic Acidaemia in Comparison with Placebo, No Intervention or Slow
Correction in LBW Infants (Review). The Cochrane Database of Systematic
Reviews. 2001. [Medline]
|